The Ratings

Clearfil Majesty ES Flow Universal


 
4.4
 
0.0 (0)
1473 0 2 2
4621-KA-CLEARFIL-MAJESTY-ES-Flow-Universal-Super-Low-UD-500x400
4620-KA-CLEARFIL-MAJESTY-ES-Flow-Universal-Super-Low-U-500x400
  • CLEARFIL-MAJESTY-ES-Flow-Universal-Brochure-WEB-PRINT
    3 MB
    13

Overall
 
4.4
Strengths
·      Liked opacity.
·      Blended well where used and excellent viscosity w/out drip or stringiness.
·      As advertised. You can eliminate most of the shade with Majesty universal.
·      Virtually bubble free and did not run after application was complete.
·      Excellent chameleon effect.
·      It seems to be more filled and so I think I would trust this in an occlusal indication if needed but it does make it thicker.
·      Good handling and polish.
·      Simplicity of shade selection/matching; easy handling with higher viscosity.
·      No voids, great polishing.
·      Easy to use. No need to think much about shade selection.
·      No slumping that you often run into.
·      Handling is very good for small restorations as well as color match except when having through and through lesions (not enough opacity).
·      I liked how it did seem to stay in place.
·      The material's dispensing tip is very precise and allows for ideal control of the material.
·      Good flow consistency, matches pretty good for a flowable.

Weaknesses
·       Still had porosities.
·       I still would not put any flowable on a surface that gets abraded. Either by another tooth or a toothbrush.
·       Opacity.
·       More shades would help.
·       Maybe too thick, but could be a strength too depending on what application a dentist is trying to accomplish.
·       Needs a bleach shade.
·       I still want more shades to do cosmetic dentistry.
·       Could use a "Universal Light" shade for lighter teeth.
·       Does not cover the whole range of Vitapan shades.
·       Adequate radiopacity but I prefer amalgam-like radiopacity myself.
·       Flow into tight areas was not as I liked.
·       Does not cover all shades in the anterior, especially when having through and through lesions. Almost too viscous to use as a liner in class 2 lesions.
·       Shades — just not enough.
·       Not ideal material for the esthetic zone and lighter shaded/bleach shaded teeth.
·       I found it to be a bit too runny for anterior restorations.
·       Maybe I am old fashioned but I don't feel comfortable not adding a hybrid layer on the occlusal to resist wear.
 
·       BOTTOM LINE
·      Like other flowables.
·      Excellent product for class 5s and posteriors.
·      Great product from a great company.
·      I would definitely buy this flowable, however I would only use it in limited applications, for example as a flowable in a class 2 followed by a packable composite or in Class 1 restorations.
·      Overall excellent material.
·      I could utilize this in my practice. I believe it could be good for certain applications.
·      A good entry into the flowable market.
·      Good product.
·      Due to simplicity of use and shade selection and easy handling, I would recommend it.
·      Good material if shade is not a priority.
·      Good composite.
·      Has unique properties that I would like but as far as a base to flow into hard to reach areas, it’s not ideal.
·      Good material.
·      It is nice handling for restorations, blends well with most shades, and polishes nicely.
·      Good product, stands out because of no slumping, otherwise, more of the same.
·      This material is more ideal for posterior class Vs and non-esthetic areas, while the dispensing tip is very precise and provides the user with a lot of control, you have to exert an abnormal amount of pressure on the plunger to extrude the material.
·      This is a good flowable composite.
·      It is a good flowable in a very competitive market.

 
 

User reviews

There are no user reviews for this listing.

All Manufacturers & Vendors